And yet again the common folk can’t see the forest for the trees. The climate emergency is a ruse designed to further impoverish and control us. They want to crush us, to grind us under their feet. They loathe and despise the common man. Complete Control is their greatest aspiration and we are handing it to them on a silver platter. NON COMPLIANCE!!!!
This was an excellent article, Antonio G. Is an embarrassment to the people of Portugal. I state this as having a Portuguese mother. And she concurs wholeheartedly. Biggest scam in our lifetime!
The elite know they can get away with it, especially when Kim Kardashian has a new bare all outfit for sale. Or Lizzo has a new tour that shows off her cellulite ass. After all, their social media influencers don't seem to care about any of this.
The genius of these distractions were prompted by the elite for the very purpose of distraction.
The best explanation I have heard to explain climate change is that the elite snobs resent the fact that average people can live in relative luxury; low cost air travel, comfortable homes with heat and air conditioning, freedom of movement via air travel or their own private vehicles, access to the wealth of goods available at any grocery store, ease of communication via cell phones, a multitude of entertainment choices whether at home on tv or at the local theater... In other words, the lifestyle afforded to the average person via the abundance of inexpensive oil, natural gas and coal fueled energy.
What good is it to be a millionaire or billionaire when the average person can have a perfectly happy lifestyle with any necessity and even a few luxuries at their fingertips; what good is it to be a rich person when the average person doesn't care because they have all they need and some of what they want ?
Capitalism has brought to the masses all the things Kings and Governments promised but never delivered.
There is no such thing as man made climate change. If there is, then why are they meeting in hot Egypt instead of Western Canada at the start of winter? Why don't they use some of their genius to warm it up here or cool it off there?
There is more oil in the planet's crust that mankind will ever find, never mind utilize.
If you take all the CO2 emitted into the atmosphere in one year from all sources man made and natural and express that amount as equaling one mile, mankind's contribution to that one mile is one half of one inch.
The climate changes. There's no doubt about that but it is not the nation's fault solely. Man has not been considerate of nature in general however we are not causing the Melt and the climate change. This Earth goes through Cycles and with all of the wicked and evil atrocities that have taken place and are taking place it's inevitable and the Earth is overdue for detoxification. After all, everything is cyclical.
These satanic Jesuits have no authority nor right to impose guidelines or policies to any man or woman on this Earth and they are all hypocrites, who think they are the
I do believe as humans we owe the planet more respect than what we’re giving her. That being said, I also believe the elite slapped a name on that and saw a massive opportunity to line their pockets and now that’s what they’re doing. They have gotten so comfortable, they don’t even know what to do with themselves. And yet here we are, the average joes, who have the numbers to stop this...sitting around eating bugs.
We have to rely on your word that this ist THE TRUTH.
Most of it is gerneral accusations. How many attendees do have a waterfron mansion? Give us the names and the numbers if you know the truth you must have them. The only numbers you provide are the metric tones used by the aicrafts and thier equivalents.
237309 barrels of Oil. That is about a fourth of what is burned daily throughout the world. If that conference would reduce the worlds comsumtion of oil by just one day it would pay of 4 times the cost.
I get the warring against elites. But hypocrisy is the lamest argument in the books. We are all hypocrites, doing something different than we say. Come up with a better critique.
I inadvertently came across another stark example of anti-knowledge in action, via the report and presentation by Prof. Simon Michaux of the Geological Survey of Finland. He simply added up all the minerals and metals which will be needed to replace all fossil fuel plants with renewable energy, wind turbines and solar panels, and replace the vehicle pool with electric cars. It seems that none of the technocrats planning the laudable goal of phasing out fossil fuels thought to do these basic sums [and so, it turns out, have been operating on anti-knowledge].
Michaux's findings are stark, and a little frightening, but point to the dream of net zero/green revolution in its current form being highly unrealistic - impossible, in fact.
According to his sums, for the first generation of renewable energy infrastructure, we would need 4.5 trillion tonnes of copper, which at todays rate of extraction, would take 190 years to mine from out of the ground. Of course, we could vastly increase our copper mining activities, at the expense of burning much more fossil fuels and significantly increasing mining pollution, but even if we did that, the known reserves of all the copper in the world amount to 800 billion tonnes, i.e. 20% of the total needed. Even then, this first generation of renewable infrastructure would need replacing in 20 years.
Michaux goes on to do the same sums for all the other metals and minerals needed, e.g. Nickel: 940 billion tonnes, which would take 400 years at current mining rates, and the world only contains 10% of this amount, or Lithium: 944 billions tonnes, which would take 10,000 years to mine, and the world only contains 2% of this amount.
As far as I know, no-one has been able to dispute Michaux's figures, and he would need to be many orders of magnitude wrong for the renewables solution to become workable (if anyone does know of alternative analysis, I would certainly like the reassurance that things aren't as bad as Michaux's report indicates).
What was very clear from his presentation is that our glorious technocratic leaders are operating on anti-knowledge, and had never even thought to do the back-of-the-envelope sums in the first place, let alone done them. I am afraid they are likely to drive us off a cliff in their steadfast pursuit of a solution which appears to be a pipe dream, based on wishful and magical thinking
And yet again the common folk can’t see the forest for the trees. The climate emergency is a ruse designed to further impoverish and control us. They want to crush us, to grind us under their feet. They loathe and despise the common man. Complete Control is their greatest aspiration and we are handing it to them on a silver platter. NON COMPLIANCE!!!!
Bill Gates is evil.
Thanks for pointing out the hypocrisy!
This was an excellent article, Antonio G. Is an embarrassment to the people of Portugal. I state this as having a Portuguese mother. And she concurs wholeheartedly. Biggest scam in our lifetime!
The elite know they can get away with it, especially when Kim Kardashian has a new bare all outfit for sale. Or Lizzo has a new tour that shows off her cellulite ass. After all, their social media influencers don't seem to care about any of this.
The genius of these distractions were prompted by the elite for the very purpose of distraction.
The best explanation I have heard to explain climate change is that the elite snobs resent the fact that average people can live in relative luxury; low cost air travel, comfortable homes with heat and air conditioning, freedom of movement via air travel or their own private vehicles, access to the wealth of goods available at any grocery store, ease of communication via cell phones, a multitude of entertainment choices whether at home on tv or at the local theater... In other words, the lifestyle afforded to the average person via the abundance of inexpensive oil, natural gas and coal fueled energy.
What good is it to be a millionaire or billionaire when the average person can have a perfectly happy lifestyle with any necessity and even a few luxuries at their fingertips; what good is it to be a rich person when the average person doesn't care because they have all they need and some of what they want ?
Capitalism has brought to the masses all the things Kings and Governments promised but never delivered.
Average people must be put in their place.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no such thing as man made climate change. If there is, then why are they meeting in hot Egypt instead of Western Canada at the start of winter? Why don't they use some of their genius to warm it up here or cool it off there?
There is more oil in the planet's crust that mankind will ever find, never mind utilize.
If you take all the CO2 emitted into the atmosphere in one year from all sources man made and natural and express that amount as equaling one mile, mankind's contribution to that one mile is one half of one inch.
http://wanniski.com/memos/mm-970625.htm
It's more than a transfer of wealth, they want us dead. What's with the name COP27, that in itself sounds like a threat.
Where ever they are living in Egypt will be in hogh class hotels with luxury & air conditioning - not exactly beduin tents that are climate friendly!!
Don't let them silence you. Instead decentralize. We need to re-infiltrate our own governments https://joshketry.substack.com/p/do-we-need-to-re-infiltrate-our-own
Do you have the source where you found this information, please?
The climate changes. There's no doubt about that but it is not the nation's fault solely. Man has not been considerate of nature in general however we are not causing the Melt and the climate change. This Earth goes through Cycles and with all of the wicked and evil atrocities that have taken place and are taking place it's inevitable and the Earth is overdue for detoxification. After all, everything is cyclical.
These satanic Jesuits have no authority nor right to impose guidelines or policies to any man or woman on this Earth and they are all hypocrites, who think they are the
G.O.A.T but THEY ARE WICKED and the fallen.
I do believe as humans we owe the planet more respect than what we’re giving her. That being said, I also believe the elite slapped a name on that and saw a massive opportunity to line their pockets and now that’s what they’re doing. They have gotten so comfortable, they don’t even know what to do with themselves. And yet here we are, the average joes, who have the numbers to stop this...sitting around eating bugs.
Tell tail sign of fake Climate movement. Will give WEF UN a serious inflow of money.
I see a lot of accusations but no proof.
We have to rely on your word that this ist THE TRUTH.
Most of it is gerneral accusations. How many attendees do have a waterfron mansion? Give us the names and the numbers if you know the truth you must have them. The only numbers you provide are the metric tones used by the aicrafts and thier equivalents.
237309 barrels of Oil. That is about a fourth of what is burned daily throughout the world. If that conference would reduce the worlds comsumtion of oil by just one day it would pay of 4 times the cost.
I get the warring against elites. But hypocrisy is the lamest argument in the books. We are all hypocrites, doing something different than we say. Come up with a better critique.
I inadvertently came across another stark example of anti-knowledge in action, via the report and presentation by Prof. Simon Michaux of the Geological Survey of Finland. He simply added up all the minerals and metals which will be needed to replace all fossil fuel plants with renewable energy, wind turbines and solar panels, and replace the vehicle pool with electric cars. It seems that none of the technocrats planning the laudable goal of phasing out fossil fuels thought to do these basic sums [and so, it turns out, have been operating on anti-knowledge].
Michaux's findings are stark, and a little frightening, but point to the dream of net zero/green revolution in its current form being highly unrealistic - impossible, in fact.
According to his sums, for the first generation of renewable energy infrastructure, we would need 4.5 trillion tonnes of copper, which at todays rate of extraction, would take 190 years to mine from out of the ground. Of course, we could vastly increase our copper mining activities, at the expense of burning much more fossil fuels and significantly increasing mining pollution, but even if we did that, the known reserves of all the copper in the world amount to 800 billion tonnes, i.e. 20% of the total needed. Even then, this first generation of renewable infrastructure would need replacing in 20 years.
Michaux goes on to do the same sums for all the other metals and minerals needed, e.g. Nickel: 940 billion tonnes, which would take 400 years at current mining rates, and the world only contains 10% of this amount, or Lithium: 944 billions tonnes, which would take 10,000 years to mine, and the world only contains 2% of this amount.
As far as I know, no-one has been able to dispute Michaux's figures, and he would need to be many orders of magnitude wrong for the renewables solution to become workable (if anyone does know of alternative analysis, I would certainly like the reassurance that things aren't as bad as Michaux's report indicates).
What was very clear from his presentation is that our glorious technocratic leaders are operating on anti-knowledge, and had never even thought to do the back-of-the-envelope sums in the first place, let alone done them. I am afraid they are likely to drive us off a cliff in their steadfast pursuit of a solution which appears to be a pipe dream, based on wishful and magical thinking